Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 2:53:06 GMT
ALaw no. with subsequent amendments and additions. . At the deadline of April the Braov Court of Appeal at the request of the appellantdefendant the Local Council of Sfntu Gheorghe Municipality ordered the referral to the High Court of Cassation and Justice based on the provisions of art. of the Code of Civil Procedure as well as the suspension of the trial until the preliminary judgment is pronounced. III. Reasons for admissibility retained by the owner of the notification.
Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section found Country Email List the admissibility of the referral motivated by the fact that the resolution of the appeal against the sentence depends on the clarification of the interpretation of the provisions that are the subject of the questions the purpose of which is to establish the the land from the public domain to the private domain of the administrativeterritorial unit as the reason for appeal invoked in the case concerns precisely the interpretation of these legal provisions in order to establish the legal regime of the land in question. At the same time the stated legal issues are new.
Because it is found that the provisions of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions which contain as a reference rule art. of the same normative act have not been analyzed up to this point and the application of the previously mentioned provisions involves different interpretations and it is necessary to pronounce a decision for the unitary interpretation of the law. In this sense Decision no. pronounced on February by the High Court of Cassation and Justice Complete for resolving some legal issues published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April . The legal issues are not the subject of an appeal in the interest of the law.
Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section found Country Email List the admissibility of the referral motivated by the fact that the resolution of the appeal against the sentence depends on the clarification of the interpretation of the provisions that are the subject of the questions the purpose of which is to establish the the land from the public domain to the private domain of the administrativeterritorial unit as the reason for appeal invoked in the case concerns precisely the interpretation of these legal provisions in order to establish the legal regime of the land in question. At the same time the stated legal issues are new.
Because it is found that the provisions of art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions which contain as a reference rule art. of the same normative act have not been analyzed up to this point and the application of the previously mentioned provisions involves different interpretations and it is necessary to pronounce a decision for the unitary interpretation of the law. In this sense Decision no. pronounced on February by the High Court of Cassation and Justice Complete for resolving some legal issues published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April . The legal issues are not the subject of an appeal in the interest of the law.